|
|
Blitz Devel : |
From: jeremic_at_[hidden]
Date: 1998-07-24 10:10:51
Hello All,
On 22 Jul, James A. Crotinger wrote:
> Actually, you've chosen a bad example. ",", "||", and "&&" are sequence
> guarantee points; i.e. they guarantee that the left argument is evaluated
> before the right argument. If the example replaced "||" with "+" then there
> could be a problem, although there shouldn't be if you design your classes
> right (IMHO).
>
> Jim
Yep I ment to use * and +. I am not sure but it might still mess things
up with regard to overloading of operator(). Worth looking into. I'll
make couple of examples in a week or so.
Best regards, Boris
--------------------- blitz-dev list --------------------------------
* To subscribe/unsubscribe: mail to majordomo_at_[hidden], with
"subscribe blitz-dev" or "unsubscribe blitz-dev" in the body of the message
* Blitz++ web page: http://oonumerics.org/blitz/