Blitz Devel :

From: Todd Veldhuizen (tveldhui_at_[hidden])
Date: 1998-08-14 11:49:41

• Next message: Derrick Bass: "BZDEV: Reindexing arrays. . ."
• Previous message: Steve Karmesin: "BZDEV: Re: Chunky loop fusion"
• In reply to: Kevin Jacobs: "Re: BZDEV: Re: Chunky loop fusion"
• Next in thread: Steve Karmesin: "BZDEV: Re: Chunky loop fusion"

Kevin Jacobs wrote:
> Does KCC on hgar1 provide any better results?

Performance results for the above expressions, using N=100000:
            Unfused Fused Chunky
T3E/KCC 27.4 43.2 34.0 (mcurie.nersc.gov)
alpha/DECcxx 8.7 12.7 11.9 (hgar1.cwru.edu)
alpha/KCC 8.7 12.6 12.2 (hgar1.cwru.edu)
i686/egcs 14.4 10.4 19.0 (n2001.lbl.gov)
O2000/KCC 14.4 22.3 18.4 (bluemountain.acl.lanl.gov)

It improves the performance of "chunky" somewhat. The
test code for chunky is written in C-style; KCC usually makes
the biggest difference when you have lots of C++ stuff
(especially lightweight classes e.g. complex<>).

Cheers,
Todd
--------------------- blitz-dev list --------------------------------
* To subscribe/unsubscribe: mail to majordomo_at_[hidden], with
"subscribe blitz-dev" or "unsubscribe blitz-dev" in the body of the message
* Blitz++ web page: http://oonumerics.org/blitz/

• Next message: Derrick Bass: "BZDEV: Reindexing arrays. . ."
• Previous message: Steve Karmesin: "BZDEV: Re: Chunky loop fusion"
• In reply to: Kevin Jacobs: "Re: BZDEV: Re: Chunky loop fusion"
• Next in thread: Steve Karmesin: "BZDEV: Re: Chunky loop fusion"