Blitz Support :

tveldhui_at_[hidden]

-- 
Todd Veldhuizen  /  tveldhui_at_[hidden]  /  Indiana University Computer Science
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Julian Cummings wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> It's possible that you may need a more current version of libtool (I
> have 1.4.3 and
> there is now a 1.5 available) or that your m4 installation is broken.  I
> just did a
> fresh checkout and configuration on my Linux box with no problems.  Here is
> what the normal output looks like:
>
> artemis [~/blitz-dev/blitz] autoreconf -fiv
> autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
> autoreconf: configure.in: not using Gettext
> autoreconf: running: aclocal  --output=aclocal.m4t
> autoreconf: `aclocal.m4' is created
> autoreconf: configure.in: tracing
> autoreconf: running: libtoolize --copy --force
> autoreconf: running: aclocal  --output=aclocal.m4t
> autoreconf: `aclocal.m4' is unchanged
> autoreconf: running: /cacr/home/user/cummings/bin/autoconf --force
> autoreconf: configure.in: not using Autoheader
> autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing
> configure.in: installing `./install-sh'
> configure.in: installing `./mkinstalldirs'
> configure.in: installing `./missing'
> benchmarks/Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp'
> autoreconf: Leaving directory `.'
>
> I do not have the symlink that Fernando Perez mentioned in his reply,
> although I do have
> a libtool.m4 file in /usr/local/share/aclocal.  I believe this file is
> used as the basis for the
> aclocal.m4 file that is created locally in the blitz directory.  The
> bootstrap script that
> Robert Techentin mentioned might be helpful, although I think it does
> more or less what
> is done by saying "autoreconf -fiv".
>
> Patrick Guio, who is helping me with Blitz maintenance, did most of the
> mods to use the
> standard autoconf tools.  I agree that using libtool here is a bit of
> overkill, since the actual
> Blitz library is pretty trivial and almost all the action is in the
> header files.  But it *really*
> does all work if your GNU tools are properly installed and up to date.
>  Of course, a more
> intelligent version of "make" would make everything much easier.
>
> Regards, Julian C.
>
>
> Todd Veldhuizen wrote:
>
> >I already have libtool 1.4.2 installed.  I tried copying libtool.m4 into
> >the blitz directory too and that didn't work.  Eventually I just commented
> >out the AC_PROG_LIBTOOL line from configure.in and that let me get a
> >makefile.  Is libtool really needed for blitz?  Should we just comment out
> >this line in cvs?
> >
> >I think the current state of affairs wrt installing from cvs is not so
> >great.
> >
> >Can we go back to including configure etc. in the cvs?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Todd
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Dr. Julian C. Cummings                       E-mail: cummings_at_[hidden]
> California Institute of Technology           Phone:  626-395-2543
> 1200 E. California Blvd., Mail Code 158-79   Fax:    626-584-5917
> Pasadena, CA 91125
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blitz-support mailing list
> Blitz-support_at_[hidden]
> http://www.oonumerics.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/blitz-support
>