Blitz Support :

From: Simon Perreault (nomis80_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-01 20:13:40

• Next message: Sureshkumar Devanathan: "[Blitz-support] A better version of linear algebra extensions to blitz available"
• Previous message: Todd Veldhuizen: "RE: [Blitz-support] FFT using blitz"
• In reply to: Todd Veldhuizen: "RE: [Blitz-support] FFT using blitz"
• Next in thread: Einar Otnes: "RE: [Blitz-support] FFT using blitz"

Todd Veldhuizen wrote:
> Well, to minimize our headaches (i.e. having to keep up with FFTW
> changes), it might make sense to just have an autodetect for fftw in
> the configure, with a --with-fftw override or somesuch. Otherwise
> we'll have to track the FFTW changes. I think the number of users
> who actually need FFTs is comparatively small. How does that
> sound?

Two thumb up from my part.

How about moving this discussion to blitz-dev?

-- 
Simon Perreault <nomis80_at_[hidden]>
http://nomis80.org
"If voting could really change things, it would be illegal."
     --Excerpt from a Diebold Election Systems internal memo.

• Next message: Sureshkumar Devanathan: "[Blitz-support] A better version of linear algebra extensions to blitz available"
• Previous message: Todd Veldhuizen: "RE: [Blitz-support] FFT using blitz"
• In reply to: Todd Veldhuizen: "RE: [Blitz-support] FFT using blitz"
• Next in thread: Einar Otnes: "RE: [Blitz-support] FFT using blitz"