Forwarded message:
>From MFlemming@ricardo-us.com Mon Apr 6 18:11:27 1998
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=Ricardo_North_Am%l=CTC-SERVER1-980406221018Z-15974@dtc-exchange4.ricardo-us.com>
From: "Flemming, Mike" <MFlemming@ricardo-us.com>
To: "'Todd Veldhuizen'" <tveldhui@oonumerics.org>
Subject: RE: Commercial use of Blitz++ ?
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 18:10:18 -0400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.995.52
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I looked at the Mozilla site over the weekend. It seems like the MozPL
license will allow commercial use provided that notification is included
in docs &c. and any useful mods that we were to make were contributed
back to the source. We do not have facilities to make any mods
available for downloading. An approach like this would be very
reasonable for us if that is consistent with your intent.
BCNU,
MF
>----------
>From: Todd Veldhuizen[SMTP:tveldhui@oonumerics.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 1998 11:47 AM
>To: Flemming, Mike
>Subject: Re: Commercial use of Blitz++ ?
>
>> I've been looking at the Blitz web pages and it appears that much of
>> what you have done would be extremely useful in our work. However, we
>> are developing commercial products which I do not believe is
>> consistent with the GNU license. Is Blitz available under any
>> licensing terms which would allow its incorporation into a commercial
>> product?
>
>Sigh. I acted to fast on GPLing blitz. I will have to adopt
>a less restrictive license.
>
>I've been reading through the netscape license faq, which provides a
>good analysis of various licensing schemes. Any suggestions you
>might have would be welcome.
>
>http://www.mozilla.org/NPL/FAQ.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 20 2002 - 04:30:04 EST