Re: OON: Comparison between Fortran & C++

From: Andrew Reilly (a.reilly@lake.com.au)
Date: Thu Mar 23 2000 - 18:31:52 EST

Next message: Andrew Reilly: "Re: OON: Aliasing (was: Comparison between Fortran & C++)"
Previous message: James A. Crotinger: "OON: Re: oon-digest V1 #57"
In reply to: Brad Lucier: "Re: OON: Comparison between Fortran & C++"
Next in thread: Brad Lucier: "Re: OON: Comparison between Fortran & C++"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 04:21:55PM -0500, Brad Lucier wrote:
> C++ vs Fortran for Scientific Computing? I'm having my students write
> code in Scheme (using Gambit-C, by Marc Feeley)

There's been a bit of discussion of scheme and dylan in comp.arch
recently. The "Stalin" scheme compiler got a few rave reviews.
Do you know how Gambit-C compares to Stalin?

-- Andrew

--------------------- Object Oriented Numerics List -------------------------- * To subscribe/unsubscribe: use the handy web form at http://oonumerics.org/oon/ * If this doesn't work, please send a note to owner-oon-list@oonumerics.org

Next message: Andrew Reilly: "Re: OON: Aliasing (was: Comparison between Fortran & C++)"
Previous message: James A. Crotinger: "OON: Re: oon-digest V1 #57"
In reply to: Brad Lucier: "Re: OON: Comparison between Fortran & C++"
Next in thread: Brad Lucier: "Re: OON: Comparison between Fortran & C++"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 20 2002 - 03:20:10 EST